(1) This is entirely consistent with the familiar field of interlocutory injunctions granted ex parte.(2) The plaintiff had failed to satisfy Justice Himel that an interim interlocutory injunction should be granted.(3) In that case the Court of Appeal refused to grant an interlocutory injunction restraining breach of confidence or breach of copyright.(4) Appeals of interlocutory orders of Superior Court judges are heard by the Divisional Court.(5) I think there was actually a separate application for an interlocutory injunction, was there not?
